You are reading

YourLIC and Public Land: Letter to the Editor

Rendering: LIC Coalition

Feb. 6, 2020

Letter To the Editor:

We thank you for your coverage of a topic that is of momentous interest to us in your stories of January 23 and 29 “Weigh in on Schools and Community Facilities at LIC Development Meeting,” and “Residents Provide Input on Art Space and School as 28-Acre LIC Development Site is Discussed,” reported by Michael Dorgan.

While the articles were detailed and well-researched, we spotted some common misconceptions about the YourLIC planning process that we would like to clarify on behalf of our respective organizations.

The articles acknowledge that YourLIC is a developer-led effort. What they do not make clear is that in 2018, several community-based groups including the Hunters Point Civic Association and Queens Community Boards 1 and 2 requested that the city sponsor a comprehensive public planning process for the 28-acre area in and around Anable Basin, with attention to the need for resiliency and transit infrastructure, family-supporting jobs, public open space, and a school. What the community has gotten instead is privately run meetings, tightly controlled by YourLIC, that imply a development framework that has not been publicly vetted or ratified.

The Anable Basin area contains 12 privately owned parcels, whose owners are presumed to be interested in upzonings, as well as parcels owned by the City of New York: a Department of Transportation site on 44th Drive, a Department of Education-owned parking lot that fronts on the river, and a 600,000 square foot industrial building owned and currently partially occupied by employees of the Department of Education. In a map accompanying the January 23 article, three of the four publicly owned sites are labeled “EDC-TFC,” referring to the city’s Economic Development Corporation and the developer TF Cornerstone. The January 29 article refers to city-owned sites “overseen by the Economic Development Corp. and developed by TF Cornerstone.”

TF Cornerstone does not own these sites; the city may intend to convey them, but they are constrained by law from doing so before a formal ULURP process, including a City Council vote, concludes.  If the city made an agreement to convey the sites to TF Cornerstone in advance of a formal disposition process, we assert that was unlawful.

We represent a coalition of organizations that believes it is in the best interest of people who live and work in Long Island City (and for New York City as a whole) for the publicly owned sites at Anable Basin to remain in public hands. The comprehensive public planning process requested by the community has yet to take place, and it is our view that when it does, most community members will oppose new private development – particularly the high-rise, mostly market rate residential towers and expensive office buildings that are likely to be built under the current scenario.

Officials may tell us that allowing dense private development is the only way to pay for amenities like parks and schools. We reject this. We are fortunate to live in a wealthy city that takes in $90 billion annually in tax revenue. Further, Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney has said that “public land should be for public purpose,” and we believe that the political will exists to consider creative approaches to securing city, state, and federal funds for the advancement of resiliency and deep affordability. It is absurd to say that the “price” of basic public services is development that will further displace industry, working artists, and low-income tenants.

We feel strongly that to convey the public sites on the Long Island City waterfront to TF Cornerstone or any other for-profit entity would amount to a dereliction of duty and a betrayal of the public trust on the part of elected officials and community leaders.  We ask that future coverage clearly defines that the outcome desired by YourLIC is not a foregone conclusion. Thank you again for your reporting.

Sincerely,

Melissa Bieri, Long Island City Coalition

Ivan Contreras, Woodside on the Move

Manny Gomez, Sunnyside Artists

Patricia Dorfman, Small Town Confidential

Yvette Kemp, Justice for All Coalition

Brent O’Leary, Hunters Point Civic Association

Memo Salazar, Western Queens Community Land Trust

*The LICPost has written about the YourLIC project on multiple occasions including:

A rendering of the sites provided by YourLIC

https://licpost.com/development-team-discusses-waterfront-open-space-congresswoman-maloney-says-make-room-for-park.

That article included a rendering of the 28-acre area, as provided by YourLIC shown below.

email the author: news@queenspost.com

5 Comments

Click for Comments 
DOL

Bravo to the letter writers. The Economic Development Corporation is a monster for the wealthy, created by the wealthy, and led and with a board made up entirely by the oligarch class. If you thought Robert Moses had power to destroy neighborhoods, this monstrosity make his destructiveness pale.

Reply
Take Care of our Vulnerable Population

I agree, “public land should be for public purpose”. The NYC Council Speaker Corey Johnson recently unveiled a new plan to fight homelessness. Johnson has been quoted as stating that “This is without exaggeration a humanitarian crisis,” and “The time has come for urgent action.” We should use the public land in LIC to build afforadable housing and a center for homeless that can provide services to help get this vulnerable population back on their feet. We have 80,000 homeless in NYC! They need help!

Reply
Anonymous

You do not speak for the majority of Queens residents. And how/why do we deem to mandate and control how people develop their own properties. Let it be whatever it is. This cohesive coordinated nightmares forced down our throats by the progressive extortion crowd has grown tiresome. For people that blew the Amazon investment in Queens pls take your proposals .

4
3
Reply
Really

“…need for resiliency and transit infrastructure, family-supporting jobs, public open space, and a school”

Isn’t that what Amazon was proposing? The people who wrote this letter to the editor, and their organizations, played an important role in rejecting Amazon. They offered no alternative plan. And now they are upset that we’re back to high rise residential towers that were always “plan A” before Amazon stepped up. Does no one else see the irony here?

12
3
Reply

Leave a Comment
Reply to this Comment

All comments are subject to moderation before being posted.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Recent News

NYPD searching for burglary crew that targeted nearly 30 laundromats in Queens and others in Brooklyn and the Bronx

Police from the 110th Precinct in Elmhurst are looking for three masked men who broke into Susan’s Laundromat at 85-12 Grand Ave. at around 3:15 a.m. on Monday, June 24, while a fourth member of their crew acted as a lookout near their getaway car parked in front.

The burglars stole $1,800 in cash and removed a payment machine for the laundry room continuing an undetermined amount of cash.