You are reading

Residents wary of Queens Plaza/Court Square rezoning, many vent how the last rezoning has caused hardship

February 6, By Christian Murray

City planning’s goal to rezone a 50-block section of the Queens Plaza/Court Square district was greeted to a frosty reception Tuesday night when the department held its first public meeting to introduce the concept.

Many of the 100-plus attendees were skeptical of the plan, fearing that it would lead to further gentrification and continue to price out existing residents and business owners/artists.

The department plans to rezone the district in order to promote the development of office space as well as increase the number of affordable housing units. The plan would, in part, try to correct the unintended consequences of City Planning’s 2001 rezoning that led to the boom in luxury housing.

In 2001, the city rezoned the Queens Plaza/Court Square district in an attempt to turn the area into a vibrant business district. The city provided developers with the ability to build huge buildings as it sought office development similar to the Citibank building. The rezoning did not restrict developers as to what type of building went up, therefore opening the door to luxury residential towers.

Since the rezoning, 13,000 units of housing have gone up or are in the process of going up, with only 5 percent of them—or 650 units—affordable, said City Planner Penny Lee at the meeting.

Meanwhile, City Planning’s 2001 goal of adding 6 million square feet in office space has fallen well short. To date only 2 million square feet of office space has been constructed or is in the process of being constructed. The lack of office space has pushed commercial rents higher, putting pressure on small businesses.

Lee said that another rezoning would help create a better balance between office and residential space as well as promote affordable housing.

“We know we don’t always get it right and in part that is why we’re here tonight,” Lee said. “We can do nothing and allow development to continue as it is and not get any affordable [housing] and not try and encourage office space to relieve pressure [on rents], or we can do a study like this and look at ways of applying an affordable housing requirement and look at ways to encourage office development.”

A rezoning would trigger the city’s Mandatory Inclusionary Housing amendment (MIH) that would require residential developers to construct affordable units on or off site.  The city would require between 20 and 30 percent of the units in any residential development to be affordable.

Few details about what City Planning has in mind in for the district were revealed at Tuesday’s meeting. The department outlined the core area that it is looking to upzone (see map) as well as a so-called “context area” where the city aims to improve services and infrastructure to make way for greater development.

Lee discussed how the city is investigating adding park space, schools and transportation but there were was little in the way specifics.

Lee and John Young, also from City Planning, spent most of the evening hearing attendees vent about the hardships they have endured since the 2001 rezoning. Given that, many were wary of City Planning’s goal to rezone the area yet again.

“The plan, to me, is more hyper-gentrification,” said Jenny Dubnau, who has an art studio in Dutch Kills

She said that there is very little being done to slow the pace of development and was skeptical about the how the plan to bolster affordable housing would change anything.”So you get crumbs of possible affordability but then you have 80 percent that are luxury [units],” she said.

Dubnau said the rent on her art studio had gone up significantly and attributed the upward prices to the development of hotels and luxury high-rise buildings nearby.

“You’re going to get some strong pushback from me and a lot of other people unless we see that the building and development being done is for us so we can stay her,” she said. Dubau said she wants the neighborhood downzoned as opposed to being upzoned.

A resident of Ravenswood Houses said the construction of the luxury towers had pushed up commercial rents too and many small businesses were struggling to remain viable.  Furthermore, she said that another rezoning would not help poor people find housing and little was being done for the people who have lived in the community for a long time.

“You have to work with the people who are here. We built this area. You can’t just discard us like we’re recyclable garbage,” she said.

The meeting got heated when attendee Ann McDermott claimed that the rezoning was the result of the mayor being paid off by the real estate industry.

“We have a mayor who is totally in the pocket of the real estate industry…” McDermott said. “But it seems like you want to get rid of everyone who’s been here and kept this place alive. We’re tired of this. We are totally tired of these presentations and the bullshit you are feeding us. The people of New York City are going to rise up against the f$$king real estate industry and were going to stop you from destroying our city.”

Others complained about the lack of services in the neighborhood.

Rebecca Olinger, a long-time Court Square resident who walks to work in Queens Plaza each day, said that there is a lack of retail services—such as drug stores, hardware stores or even a bakery. She complained that many of the new developments were self contained with their own gyms and other amenities.

Lee said the Court Square/Queens Plaza area has yet to become a 24 hour neighborhood. Therefore, businesses are largely limited to evenings and weekends to generate business.

The meeting was the first of several public meetings expected to take place by the end of June, where residents and businesses owners are being encouraged to put forward their views as to what a rezoning should entail.

From that point City Planning aims to put forward its recommendations, which would start the rezoning process. That process could take up to seven months.

Presentation Jan. 31 City Planning by Queens Post on Scribd

email the author: [email protected]

9 Comments

Yassss

It’s clearly all about the money
Otherwise intelligent and informed people wouldn’t cram the volume of people from 20,000 new apartments into the existing subway system
The 7 train has been decent now, although at rush hour the platform at Queensboro plaza is insane.
Imagine the people from even 5,000 new apartments…..and we’re getting 20,000




0



0
Reply
MRLIC

Anon is CORRECT. Overkill in 1 area poorly planned does not work. Elected officials are the problem ROOT CAUSE, they are inn the pockets of the developers (Hear this Jimmy Van Bramer). Stop the MADNESS is right. There is a solution Danny , stop building and upzoning everything for developers. Old time residents are being priced out which is very unfair. No one is working with hem just chasing them out. Elected Officials don’t care as they complain about affordable Housing. The 24,00o apartments for the Sunnyside yards will yield only 4,500 so called (“AFFIORDABLE APARTMENTS”). If it were the other way around you might make a little dent in the affordable housing needed. here is a solution but the Greedy Developers would not make a tidy profit. Enough Said.




0



0
Reply
DannyZ

A neighborhood is desolate, and not improving. People complain. The city spurs development. Consequently, the situation on the ground improves and demand spikes. Then we have thes same longtime residents complain that they are being priced out.

It’s a viscous cycle. But I’m not sure there’s any solution.




0



0
Reply
Anon

It’s not just the longtime residents. It’s also the newcomers who recognize the city fails to plan and develop responsibly. The solution is to stop the madness. The city should look at neighborhoods that aren’t in the process of becoming overdeveloped like Queens Plaza and Court Square.




0



0
Reply
Root cause

Millions are moving here from other parts of the US over the next decade, mostly for “jobs.” You can not zone and have chaos or up zone and mitigate the effects of mass migration. But even perfect zoning can’t stop the flow. It’s not elected officials fault.




0



0
Reply
MRLIC

City Planning will go through with their plan anyway as they listen but really don’t hear or CARE what happens to long time residents. Don’t be fooled and don’t trust the Mayor or the City Council & the City Planning.




0



0
Reply
Anonymous

Rise up is right! We have had it with the invasion of developers who see the people of NYC as under-performing assets that need to be shed ASAP. And they don’t just have to “get it right” this time they have to compensate people for tearing their lives apart. If you want a thriving community heal the wounds you have caused.




0



0
Reply
Anon

Don’t drink the city planning Kool Aid. They don’t work for the best interests of the people who live in the neighborhoods they are trying to change. Fight back.




0



0
Reply

Leave a Comment
Reply to this Comment

All comments are subject to moderation before being posted.

Recent News