June 15, 2014 By John O’Reilly
During recent Community Board 2 meetings, the term “transparency” has been used with greater frequency to describe the Board and its various committees’ actions and functions. Is this description accurate?
No. Community Board 2 fails to make important community information easily accessible and does not provide details about who sits on the Board and how its decisions are made.
The Board would be “transparent” if it were good and fast at answering requests for information from the public and published a large amount of information without the need for requests—such as publishing on its website detailed information on community issues pending before the Board.
While the Board does post an upcoming agenda on its website (after three click-throughs under the heading: “Calendar of Events”), a transparent Board would provide the public with the same information and data (or as much as possible) on its website that the Community Board/committee will use to render a decision. Such data should be available well before the Board makes a decision on a host of matters—whether it’s dealing with moving a municipal facility to the area, modifying a local park or allowing a local establishment to expand its facilities.
The Community Board currently publishes it minutes on the website weeks/months after a meeting and provides a numerical count of a Board vote with a brief description of points made.
The Board minutes should be more transparent. They should name the vote made by each member on a particular matter and identify the Board member by name when they make a comment or ask a question. After all, members of the public, guests, public officials and Board officers who speak are identified by name with a brief description of the comment.
The Board does list the names of its members on the Board website. However, would it be more transparent if it included the date of original and subsequent appointment(s) and periods of Board service? (Is it really true that a significant portion of members have served on the Board since the last century?) Would it be more transparent to include in the identification of the Board’s officers, the time period each has held his/her position, including prior and current terms of office?
Would including the closest cross streets and neighborhood (e.g., 46th Street and 47th Avenue, Sunnyside) of each Board member’s residence and/or the name and address of a member’s business enhance transparency and dispel widely held beliefs that certain neighborhoods are over-represented and other neighborhoods are under-represented on the Board?
Questions about transparency and the Community Board should not be misinterpreted to denigrate the dedication and service of Board members and its officers, who serve as volunteers, nor as criticism of the Community Board’s limited staff, who perform a broad range of valuable work for the benefit of the community.
However, Community Board 2 is not transparent; it does not have a policy on transparency; and Board members/officers seem to use the term “transparency” to deflect good faith questions about how and why decisions are made. Community Board 2 adheres to a minimalist approach to providing information to the public.
If a member of the community wants to learn more than the basic, required information included on the Community Board’s website and for example wants to learn details about a City agency’s plans to acquire property in the community, like the Fire Department’s proposal for a multifaceted facility on 43rd Street, an appointment must be made during the business day at a mutually convenient time to visit the Board’s office on 50th Street to view relevant documents in the Board’s files but only with a Community Board staff person at your side.
If the community member wants to take a mobile device image of pages of documents, special permission is required and a second appointment is needed, again under the observation of a staff person. This process is generally described as Soviet style transparency.
If a community member wants to obtain a copy of the Board’s By Laws, and requests to the Community Board are frustrated by non-response, and instead has to utilize back channel, secondary sources to obtain the legal document which provides the framework for the Board and its actions, that’s not transparent. (Community Board 2’s By Laws are available on the internet not on the Board’s website but rather via a link in a May 1, 2014 news story published by the Sunnyside Post.
There are important reasons for the Community Board to take the time to develop and implement a policy on transparency. The benefits of actual transparency include enhanced accountability and lessened distrust of the Board and its actions. The community has the right to hold Community Board 2 and its committees to account for how they act and for the decisions they take.
Rumor and suspicion about Board members and individual motives would be greatly reduced if more and better information is readily available. Actual transparency will enhance community participation in the Community Board and committee work, and result in better informed and more readily accepted decisions. Discussion of community issues often devolve to statements that one side or the other need to become involved in the process, but to be involved it is essential that people can readily access a wide range of information to facilitate participation in a real and effective way in community matters, including speaking at Board meetings and public hearings.
Actual transparency will promote efficiency in the Board’s work and use of staff time. Making documents and data readily available to the community has the benefit of promoting information management and reliance on facts rather than anecdotes. As a result, the Community Board and committees will have a framework for better, more fact-based decision-making and more effective communication with the public about decisions. Board staff time will not be consumed with setting up appointments, locating documents, sitting and watching a community member’s review of documents, finding out if an image can be taken of a public document, rinse and repeat the foregoing cycle when the community member has to return to the Board’s office.
Limited staff and staff time is usually cited as the primary reason why a more effective website can’t be developed, why more and better information can’t be provided, and why documents can’t be put into a form readily accessible on the Board’s website. However, several community Boards around New York City have already acted in varying degrees to provide better and more readily available information on their respective websites than is provided by CB 2.
Improvement in CB 2’s web site can easily commence with finding out how the other Boards have been able to act and incorporating their practices.
Community Board 2 should act as soon as possible to implement the reality of Board transparency increasingly mentioned by its officers and members.
As is obvious by their abhorrent behavior toward one group and cuddly embrace toward the other.
In addition to not being transparent, they are biased and pushy.
they do list committee members btw ~ and an entire links page on Govt
“Put forth members on each committee and briefly it does.”
“Put forth members on each committee and briefly describe what it does.”
Furthermore, the writer neglects their homework by not providing concrete solutions, backed with examples of other CB’s reforms such as Term Limits. Call me if you want an editor and let’s really make a change, not simply make a gripe. Let’s be effectual. As Jimmy Van Bramer said to me repeatedly, this is a democracy.
One idea I would have brought up to have a meaningful discussion on CB Transparency is to propose whether the members have political associations, what is the procedure for appointment, and how can the antiquated process evolve to reflect the whole of the community? Put forth members on each committee and briefly it does.
And YES, the bilaws should be readily available on the CB2 site.
With regard to the site itself, what community member can volunteer his/her/their services to improve the site? Make meaningful suggestions that will help the Board and not be combative. The hard work was only acknowledged once in this article. Demand the thought process in a better way for better interaction and results. Because I would love to results now.
“Gimme don’t Get”
While some of what the writer says is interesting, it should be more substantiated and fact-driven. As much as I agree regarding the issue of Transparency with the CB’s, some of this article is NOT factual and needs better substantiation, backed with examples. Also to be noted, I agree that there should be more transparency and not simply because the Board says there is. I will say, they do post meetings, times, places and minutes. How are we to be taken seriously as members of/neighbors in this community?
However, to that point, the CB2 did NOT provide what they said they would from prior (June 5th) meeting such as putting forth “Guidelines” for the use of backyard dining. The Board stated they would put forth Guidelines, which was not done. Unless that is, we are to understand the CB2 has decided to make their Guidelines those of NYS’s which were provided at the last City Services & Public Safety Committee Meeting. This issue was addressed simply by saying the Board would go on a case-by-case basis, which is NOT setting forth Guidelines but ducking the issue all-together.
Sonny (Lise) Laurent
I agree 100% with you article. There is only one explanation to their action and decisions MONEY. They should investigate further, to see if there was any case of corruption and let’s the court decided. My advice to you CB2 members is “run”, just quit and find a real job. CB2 members are urgently in need of new blood anyways. They represent the LIC of the 70s, full of factories and no people. Luckily the neighborhood has changed and needs to be represented accordingly by younger members with new ideas and unafraid of the future. LIC is one of the areas with the greatest potential to grow in NY. We cannot let a group of 10 people prevent it.
We need more bars, restaurant, with BACKYARDS!!. The law protects them! please remember “we are innocent until proven otherwise”, which means If I broke the law I should receive a penalty, but never before. The neighborhood has change and there is no turning back, is up to you CB2 to follow the change or step aside, and guest what? you are already being left behind.
Why should we care about them anyways. Let’s just not follow their rules and decisions as they are against the progress of our community.
If they want to fight back, well, let’s see them in Court and see what happens. Bunch of losers.