You are reading

CB2: City Planning’s lax LIC Core organization made for sparsely attended public workshops

33rd Street looking into Queenboro Plaza

Sept. 18, 2017 by Nathaly Pesantez

The Department of City Planning, which has been holding a series of public workshops over the summer to gather community feedback on the needs of a 50-block section in the Queens Plaza/Court Square neighborhood, has done a poor job of organizing them, which has resulted in low public turnout at the workshops, according to a key Community Board 2 member.

The workshops, part of City Planning’s LIC Core Study, are meant to give residents an opportunity to communicate the needs of the area to multiple city agencies. The feedback is expected to be used by City Planning when issuing a recommendation for the possible rezoning of the neighborhood to the mayor.

Lisa Deller, chair of CB2’s Land Use Committee, said City Planning’s handling of the public workshops has been far from stellar. She said the agency has been late to notify the public as to the meeting dates, since the department itself has been slow in organizing them due to issues with finalizing dates and agreeing on workshop locations.

City Planning disputes these claims.

“I don’t think there were more than 50 people at the meetings,” Deller said. Given the implications of the project for the future of Long Island City, Deller characterized the meetings as alarmingly poor in attendance.

Community participation was further affected by the fact that the bulk of the public workshops, with multiple city agencies and organizations involved in topics ranging from open space, retail, and housing affordability of the area, were held over the summer, a time that Deller said was not “optimal” for most people of the area.

“There’s a huge amount at stake,” Deller said about the meetings. “This is an effort to engage various agencies in the process of planning, such that it’s not just rampant development [in Long Island City]. They include community improvement and things that the people are demanding.”

Deller said the first meeting of the summer held more agency people and note takers than community participants, a sight that “disappointed” her. Other workshops had the same makeup, and   during the Aug. 8 meeting on housing affordability, land use, and climate resilience attendees called for better notice for future events.

Aside from the lack of public notice caused by organizational issues, Deller also believes that the workshops lack representation from senior members of the various city agencies at play in the LIC Core.

“I think it’s important for the people to have senior staff there listening, and I felt like there were a lot of junior staff at these sessions,” Deller said.

The methods that city agency representatives used to organize feedback at the meetings, like placing post-it-notes on large-scale maps, also troubled Deller.

“They may be gathering information, but if they don’t feed it back in a constructive, hard way, then people just feel like it’s not productive,” Deller said.

City Planning has provided better notification for its upcoming Sept. 28 LIC Core session on workforce development, according to Deller. Ultimately, she says the workshops are crucial for the public to attend, as issues that have been continuously raised by the neighborhood, including open space, housing affordability, retail, and infrastructure, may be worked into the potential rezoning of the area.

City Planning, however, disagrees that the meetings have been sparsely attended, and assures that the public workshops have been promoted well before their dates.

“Throughout this past summer, the Department of City Planning held several well-attended community meetings on its LIC Core Study, as part of its extensive outreach strategy. To notify the public of these events, we sent calendar items to local Queens newspapers, posted flyers and reached out directly to community organizations to help us spread the word,” said Joe Marvilli, a press officer for DCP.

“For those who couldn’t make these meetings, DCP will cover all of the topics that we discussed this summer in a series of upcoming meetings…we intend to hold several more yet-to-be-scheduled meetings throughout the fall and next year,” he added.

City Planning says they have completed 16 outreach activities so far this year, including the three public workshops over the summer and the more recent one that took place during the Ravenswood Houses Family Day on Sept. 9.

The next meeting will be held on Sept. 28 at the Long Island City Community Library on 37-44 21st at 7 p.m. The topic of discussion will be workforce development.

email the author: [email protected]

7 Comments

Click for Comments 
Anonymous

Seems that maybe they’ve done a “poor” job because perhaps they don’t want anyone to attend or would try to make the excuse that low turnout means the community doesn’t care. Leaving the developers to run wild w/ the DCP’s blessing. Gotta love NYC!

Reply
MRLIC

Why can’t they down zone? Forget anymore building unless it’s all affordable. Even then I would limit it because the infrastructure is already over burdened. A few stores would be nice. Make the supposed development a park on 44th drive. We don’t need anymore Ivory Towers or Hotels.

Reply
OAR

I have attended 2 of these meetings and they were both lightly attended, both held at the CUNY Law School and at each there were at most 50-60 people and that is stretching it. Both times I learned of the meetings through a facebook post. Nothing was posted in any neighborhood store, the library etc. As for posting in the local newspaper, how many people read the local papers? At each meeting those attending were vehemently against the proposal to up zone. I even asked why not down zone to the original zoning and then if the developers want to build taller they have to build with some affordable. I was told they can’t do that, which I replied, they did just that in Dutch Kills just north of the bridge. They want low to no turn out so they can say they held these meetings but no one cares because no one came to the meetings.

Reply
OAR

I have attended 2 of these meetings and they were both lightly attended, both held at the CUNY Law School and at each there were at most 50-60 people and that is stretching it. Both times I learned of the meetings through a facebook post. Nothing was posted in any neighborhood store, the library etc. As for posting in the local newspaper, how many people read the local papers? At each meeting those attending were vehemently against the proposal to up zone. I even asked why not down zone to the original zoning and then if the developers want to build taller they have to build with some affordable. I was told they can’t do that, which I replied, they did just that in Dutch Kills just north of the bridge. They want low to no turn out so they can say they held these meetings but no one cares because no one came to the meetings.

Reply
Anonymous

City Planning. Is this a joke? That department is a joke. What area’s or place’s was planned well by this department.
Stop,Please.

Reply
Yea....

There was poor planning because NYC Politicians don’t want the people to have a voice. All the politicians want is the real estate developers to have the voice. The RE developers are just as bad as the central banks.

Reply

Leave a Comment
Reply to this Comment

All comments are subject to moderation before being posted.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Recent News

MTA seizes 19 ‘ghost’ cars registered to toll violators at Queens Midtown Tunnel on Monday

Two days before the MTA Board approved the controversial congestion pricing plan for Manhattan on Wednesday, the agency cracked down on persistent toll violators at the Queens Midtown Tunnel in Long Island City.

MTA Bridges and Tunnels seized 19 vehicles registered to persistent scofflaws on Monday and issued 81 summonses and confiscated two fraudulent incense plates. The MTA noted that the scofflaws accounted for approximately $483,000 in combined unpaid tolls and fees. One of the top persistent toll violators from the targeted enforcement owed nearly $76,000 in tolls and fees.