You are reading

Several Renewable Energy Projects Coming Online, Reduces Need for NRG’s Rejected Power Plant: Pols

The NRG plant currently occupies 15 acres within the 300-acre Con-Edison complex in Astoria (NRG)

Oct. 28, 2021 By Allie Griffin

A number of renewable energy projects will be soon be coming online — negating the need for NRG’s proposed peaker plant that the state rejected earlier this week, according to several Queens leaders.

Local politicians said the state has no need for NRG’s proposal, which sought to overhaul the company’s 50-year-old peaker plant in Astoria by replacing its oil- and gas-fired turbines with a natural gas-fired generator.

The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation rejected NRG’s controversial application on Wednesday saying that it failed to comply with the requirements of the Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act, state legislation that places strict limits on emissions.

The existing NRG plant will be forced to close in May 2023, since it will no longer comply with state-level restrictions on nitrogen oxide emissions.

The loss of energy from the plant’s retirement — and other New York peaker plants slated to close at that time — will be made up by a number of Con Edison projects, according to the New York State Public Service Commission. The electric company is developing three transmission projects, collectively known as Transmission Reliability and Clean Energy Projects or TRACE projects, to make up for the energy loss.

The projects are designed to reduce pollutants in communities like Astoria where peaker power plants have affected nearby residents’ air quality for years. They aim to help New York transition to a cleaner, lower-carbon electric grid.

Former Astoria Council Member Costa Constantinides, a longtime environmental advocate, said it didn’t make sense for NRG to bring a fossil fuel-powered plant online when several clean energy projects are already in the works.

“We have all these great renewable projects coming,” Constantinides said. “Then we are going to open a fossil fuel plant. It just doesn’t fit.”

Constantinides named a number of projects that will soon be constructed like the Champlain Hudson project, which will be delivering 1,200 megawatts of green electricity from the U.S.-Canadian border to the Astoria Energy Complex starting in 2025.

He also said Equinor, a Norwegian energy giant, is developing an offshore wind farm that will transmit power under the Long Island Sound to a substation in Astoria. And Constantinides mentioned the potential to build and store renewable energy on Rikers Island via the Renewable Rikers Act, which he championed during his City Council tenure.

The DEC’s rejection of the plant was also applauded by lawmakers such as U.S. Sen. Chuck Schumer, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, State Senators Michael Gianaris and Jessica Ramos, Assembly Member Zohran Mamdani and Queens Borough President Donovan Richards among others.

State Sen. Michael Gianaris, U.S. Senator Charles Schumer, State Senator Jessica Ramos, Assembly Member Zohran Mamdani, and Tiffany Caban held a press conference in opposition to the proposed NRG power plant in Astoria this summer. (Courtesy: Office of State Sen. Gianaris)

Ocasio-Cortez called the state’s decision a major climate victory for the district.

“Earlier this year, fossil fuel co. NRG began to rush high-pollution, fracked-gas peaker plants into our community,” she posted on Twitter. “We organized all year against it while securing wind + solar projects. Today the plant was denied. When we mobilize, we win.”

Richards said Queens residents made it clear they didn’t want the proposed plant from the very beginning.

“Queens has been emphatic and clear from the beginning: NRG’s proposed power plant in Astoria is antithetical to our critically important mission to eliminate our city’s dependence on fossil fuels and build a future centered on clean, renewable energy,” he said in a statement.

“We applaud the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation for denying NRG’s permits and standing with the families of Astoria in opposition to this disastrous plan.”

NRG, however, said its proposal would have immediately reduced the amount of pollution emitted from the peaker plant. The company argued that the city cannot be powered by renewable energy sources alone — given current technology. NRG added that it would have been able to convert the revamped plant to green hydrogen in the future.

email the author:
No comments yet

Leave a Comment
Reply to this Comment

All comments are subject to moderation before being posted.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Recent News