July 1, 2020 By Christian Murray
A development team plans to rezone five city blocks on the border of Long Island City and Astoria in order to erect more than a dozen buildings that would consist of 2,700 apartments, a school, as well as retail and office space.
The real estate team—comprised of Silverstein Properties, Kaufman Astoria Studios and BedRock Real Estate Partners– plans to spend $2 billion to create a new mixed-use district between 37th Street and Northern Boulevard, bound by 35th and 36th Avenues.
The development area, which is little over 8 ½ acres in size, is currently zoned for manufacturing and a rezoning is required before the development can move forward. The plans call for buildings that for the most part would range in height from 10 to 26 stories.
“This is an opportunity to reactivate five largely dormant blocks, next to the Steinway Street Corridor and Kaufman Arts District,” said Tom Corsillo a spokesperson for the development group.
The developers believe their plans would be a boost for the local economy at a time when small businesses are struggling. They say it would create 5,400 jobs, consisting of 3,700 construction jobs and 1,700 permanent jobs.
The proposed development—dubbed “Innovation QNS”– would be 2.7 million square feet in size, with 2.2 million square feet dedicated for residential use. The plans include 235,000 square feet of office space; 192,000 square feet of retail space; and 88,000 square feet for community use. The proposed school would be 80,000 square feet.
The developers say that a portion of space would be made available to startups, artists/makers and community-based nonprofit profit organizations at below-market rents.
“This is a time when people desperately need jobs, and this project will serve as an enormously important stimulus for Astoria and New York City,” said Larry Silverstein, chairman and founder of Silverstein Properties, in a statement.
The office space would be concentrated in two buildings on 35th Avenue between 37th and 38th Streets, with some on Northern Boulevard. The larger buildings—primarily residential in nature—would go up by Northern Boulevard and Steinway Street.
The developers said that 700 of the 2,700 units would be “affordable.” They are required to provide affordable housing under the city’s Mandatory Affordable Housing program that requires affordable housing with rezonings. The developers plan to offer the affordable units to people who earn up to 60 percent of the median income level.
Some of the affordable housing would also be offered to seniors. The senior housing would be managed by HANAC, an Astoria-based non-profit.
The existing UA Kaufman Astoria Cinemas on 38th Street as well as the PC Richards building on Steinway Street would be demolished to make way for the development. A new multiplex cinema would be incorporated into the new development and PC Richards is expected to move nearby.
“We are not displacing residents or taking away housing or parking and the businesses that are here today will be relocated nearby or within the development,” said Tracy Capune, vice president of Kaufman Astoria Studios on a conference call.
The project, designed by ODA New York, would have a heavy focus on open space, with more than 2 1/4 acres—or 26 percent of the total site area– dedicated toward it.
The developers aim to build a park around the existing Playground Thirty Five at the corner of Steinway and 35th Avenue. Additionally the development would include several urban plazas, gardens and courtyards.
“Public open space is the foundation of our plan and it is clearly something we can add to in a district that is sorely lacking in greenspace,” Capune said.
The developers say that the plans are based on two years of ongoing discussions with area stakeholders.
Capune said that the plans have been shaped by discussions with community leaders and business groups, such as the Steinway Astoria Partnership. The developers have also been in discussions with nearby businesses owners and say that they have conducted an online survey of 1,200 residents.
The developers plan to start the ULURP rezoning process in the spring or fall of 2021.
The plans would therefore go before Community Board 1 next year and the city council would likely to vote on it before the end of 2021. The development is located within the 26th Council District which is represented by Jimmy Van Bramer.
Van Bramer took to twitter Thursday to announce he opposed it.
The developers aim to break ground in 2023 and complete the entire project within 10 years.
8 Comments
It looks like the kind of thing you’d find in downtown San Jose, a combo Mall-and-housing-complex. Ugly, sterile, so very modern, and not in the least bit New York.
This would be a great project! Those blocks have many underutilized one story industrial buildings, many blocks of car dealerships, this would be a great improvement.
No doubt that there will be plenty of complainers due to the fact that this project won’t produce an over abundance of 2 bedroom apartments for$750 a month but this is going to be a welcomed shot in the arm for a long neglected part of the neighborhood.
Of course there will be those who will lament the loss of a bunch of private parking lots and dilapidated warehouses.
They have been talking about this for at least 3 or 4 years, seems like the Silverstein group would have brought this to Uniform Land Use committee before 2021. I can’t see it happening, unless they are waiting until 2021 for VanBramer to be term limited out of office.
With all that said I truly welcome the investment of people who think big and are genuinely improving upon some of these dilapidated warehouses, vacant lots, private parking lots and the movie theater which is great but could be built upon for greater public use while still keeping a movie theater in the neighborhood. Best wishes to the developers.
Post-Amazon, mid-COVID verdict: DOA.
Record construction in Long Island City has not been accompanied by any significant increase in transit capacity to accommodate thousands of new residents. The same is true for thousands more who commute from other neighborhoods to jobs in LIC.
There are opportunities to increase capacity and service by running trains more frequently mid-day, evenings, overnight and weekends on the #7 line. Until the 1980’s, there was Manhattan bound express service till 12:30 PM. Flushing bound express service began after 1 PM. There has been no express service between 10 AM and 3 PM due to periodic ongoing track, power, signal, and routine maintenance projects for decades.
There are opportunities to increase capacity and service by running trains more frequently mid-day, evenings, overnight and weekends for both the #7 and G subway lines. There is always equipment used primarily for rush hour peak service that is available to provide additional service during off peak hours. It is a question of finding millions of dollars more to cover operating costs for additional service.
Why not extend 8 of 14 Long Island Rail Road trains currently terminating at Hunters Point during AM rush hour to LIC? Turn trains around to provide reverse commuter service. In the PM rush hour, start 7 of 12 trains from LIC instead of Hunters Point. Establish new off peak, mid day and evening service between LIC and Jamaica.
New ferry services will be able to accommodate only so many riders. In many cases, a majority of new residents and employees will need the subway rather than the ferry to access employment, educational, medical and entertainment opportunities in Manhattan and other boroughs. The continued economic success of new business coming to LIC is dependent upon not only additional transportation capacity, but capital improvements to sewer, water, electrical and utility assets as well. Municipal fire, police and sanitation services will also have to be expanded. What is the cost and who will pay for all these additional capital improvements and services?
(Larry Penner — transportation advocate, historian and writer who previously worked for the Federal Transit Administration Region 2 NY Office.)
Unfettered development apparently is of no concern to developers or Amazon which is beyond me. You would think these developers would consider the issues you raise. But I did notice the Court House Square 7 train station changed its name to Court Square and was revamped some years ago. The N line stations have been remodeled. That’s how I know developers are pushing the politicians to spend money renovating stations.
Agreed that we need better mass transit infrastructure but this construction project is nowhere near the 7 train, the LIRR or the ferries that you wrote about. Your thoughts might have made sense if you at least mentioned the N or W trains. Did you read the article?
Seems like a great project to me. If you can’t build new housing on vacant parking lots where will we be able to build them?