You are reading

Exclusive: Class action lawsuit accuses LIC landlord of illegal rent overcharges

The Arc at 30-02 39th Ave. in Long Island City. Photo via Google Maps.

Feb. 25, 2025 By Ethan Marshall

Multiple tenants of an apartment building at 30-02 39th Ave. in Long Island City have submitted a class action lawsuit against their landlord, 30-02 Associates LLC, accusing them of illegal rent overcharges.

The lawsuit was filed against the landlord of this 428-unit building, known as the Arc, following an investigation by the Housing Rights Initiative, a non-profit watchdog that investigates real estate fraud, connects tenants to legal services and promotes their rights to fair and affordable housing.

Based on the investigation’s findings, tenants of the Arc have been getting overcharged in rent since it was built in 2017. The Housing Rights Initiative estimates that the tenants are owed more than $20 million in rent refunds and millions more in rent reductions. The nonprofit found that in 2021 alone, the landlord received over $3 million in tax credits.

The Arc participates in the 421-a program, meaning the landlord is required to register the units with the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR). These apartments were supposed to be treated as rent-stabilized. However, the tenants allege that the landlord has willfully not met the requirements of the 421-a program and rent stabilization laws.

While the 421-a program states that all rent increases have to be derived from the initial cost of rent paid by the tenants, the tenants allege that the landlord registered initial rents at much higher prices than what they were paying. They also accuse the landlord of wrongfully registering a lower rent. These preferential rents were representative of the actual rents that initial tenants were actually charged.

The Housing Rights Initiative concluded that 30-02 Associates LLC used early occupancy concessions to inflate the cost of rent. Initial occupants were referred to as “licensees,” allowing them to occupy their apartments before the purported start date of the lease.

One such example involved a tenant who paid $3,925 for a two-year lease but received one month free, resulting in an average rent of $3,768. However, the landlord registered the initial rent as $3,925, with all future rent increases taken from that amount.

Consequently, this shows that while temporary rent concessions were given to initial tenants, the landlord did not reflect these concessions in Arc’s initial registrations with the DHCR, allowing 30-02 Associates LLC to make rent increases higher than what is permitted. All future rent increases that were permitted stemmed from the illegal registration, meaning an accurate rent has never been set for the tenants.

According to the rent stabilization law RSC § 2521.2, preferential rent is supposed to be triggered by an agreement being made by the owner for a payment that is less than the legally regulated rent of a unit. The Housing Stability and Tenant Protection Act of 2019 (HSTPA) grants landlords the ability to increase the preferential rent by an amount permitted by the Rent Guidelines Board during renewal. Tenants in rent-stabilized units are required to be given lease options for one or two years.

Tenants accuse the landlord of manipulating the terms of the leases and the payment amounts, allowing them to get around the protections provided by the HSTPA. For example, one of the tenants was offered an 18-month lease with a Legal Regulated Rent of $4,948.13. However, as a result of the landlord manipulating the manner in which payments were allocated, this tenant ended up paying much less on an average monthly basis.

This lease also had concessions for five of the 18 months, making the preferential rent $3,573.65. But when it came time to renew the unit, the landlord refused to renew the preferential rent concession, violating RSC § 2522.5, which prevents landlords from changing the terms and conditions of a rent-stabilized tenancy during its renewal. The landlord wound up increasing the rent by more than 45%, to $5,195.54, failing to follow the Rent Guidelines Board’s permitted 5% increase.

The class action lawsuit alleges the rent concessions provided by the landlords were just preferential rents by another name, with “free rent” being provided for a certain period rather than monthly discounts. While the tenants were initially charged lower than the legal registered rent, camouflaging the preferential rent as a concession enabled the landlord to violate governing law by making excessive rent increases on renewals. The landlord then allegedly further used concessions on subsequent tenancies, avoiding setting preferential rents and allowing themself to make higher rent increases, which was in violation of the amount permitted by the Rent Guidelines Board.

The tenants are being represented in this case by real estate attorney Roger Sachar of the firm Newman Ferrara LLP. According to Sachar, it is becoming increasingly common for landlords to violate rent regulations. They have received many calls from tenants of buildings operated by the Lightstone Group, which operates 30-02 39th Ave., claiming their landlords have done this as well.

“The landlord’s cheating and taking tax benefits that require it to provide tenants with the benefit of rent stabilization, and they just decided that it’s wonderful that they get tax benefits, but they never register the apartments properly,” Sachar said. “The landlord has to fix the problem and refund the overcharge.”

Sachar, along with Newman Ferrara LLP partner and New York Law School Adjunct Professor Lucas Ferrara, feel a lack of state and local government enforcement has led to more landlords attempting to skirt rent regulations.

“The government operates basically like the IRS. They accept submissions at face value,” Ferrara said. “It’s only when these submissions are audited or challenged that the government possibly wakes up and takes action. I think the DHCR (Division of Housing and Community Renewal), the state agency that oversees that regulation, is understaffed. They just don’t have the resources to address this irregularity.”

Even when government action is taken against these landlords, Ferrara feels they get away with a slap on the wrist, as the monetary fines do not dissuade them from doing this. He believes punishments for this should be more severe, even floating the idea of jail time under certain circumstances.

“[The landlords] cry poverty to the regulators, but they feast on taxpayer gold,” Ferrara said.

“We trust the courts to recognize that right is on the tenants’ side here and the landlord is blatantly cheating,” Sachar said. “So far, we’ve had significant success in the courts recognizing that, and we anticipate that continuing.”

Following the filing of the lawsuit, 30-02 Associates LLC criticized the legitimacy of the allegations.

“This is another in a series of lawsuits filed by this law firm against dozens of landlords throughout New York City on this same issue. We believe we have acted legally and appropriately and this lawsuit is without merit,” 30-02 Associates LLC said in a statement.

email the author: news@queenspost.com
No comments yet

Leave a Comment
Reply to this Comment

All comments are subject to moderation before being posted.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Recent News

MTA opens three new modernized elevators at the Queens Plaza subway station in Long Island City

The Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) announced the opening of three new modernized elevators at the Queens Plaza E/M/R subway station in Long Island City earlier this month as part of a larger accessibility and safety upgrades throughout the transit system.

The work included a full replacement of the cab and equipment within the cab, shaft and pit, along with two new elevator head houses located at street level. Crews also made modifications to the shaft and pit as needed to allow for new equipment. The elevator machine room and electrical and mechanical equipment received replacements and other modernization efforts for reliability.

Queens Together launches ‘Unofficial US Open Dining Guide’ encouraging fans to sample restaurants along the 7 line

Aug. 20, 2025 By Shane O’Brien

The US Open returns to Flushing Meadows Corona Park this Sunday, with more than 1 million attendees anticipated to take mass transit to the iconic annual tennis event. With hundreds of thousands of fans set to take the 7 out to the Billie Jean King National Tennis Center, there is a world of delicious local eateries lying beneath the elevated train tracks should any fan wish to stop en-route to the US Open.

Can Queens’ food scene thrive with both trucks and restaurants?

Aug. 19, 2025 By Jessica Militello

In Jackson Heights at 4 p.m. on a Thursday afternoon, Roosevelt Avenue is buzzing with energy as commuters file in and out of subway cars and onto the street and cars and trucks grapple to get down the busy road. The street is filled with rows of shops and restaurants, along with food carts, street vendors and food trucks along the avenue. The almost-but-not-quite the weekend lag leaves hungry commuters faced with another choice to make throughout their day and the array of food truck options in busy areas like Jackson Heights offers customers convenience and delicious food without breaking the bank, two features that can feel vital, particularly with rising costs of living and pressure from inflation.